Law. Power. Rethinking a Court that has gone off its rails.

Supremely Rogue examines how the modern Supreme Court has broken with tradition.

For most of its history, the Court worked toward consensus, moved incrementally, and treated the Constitution and precedent as stabilizing guides. Today’s Court often does the opposite: sharp ideological splits, sudden reversals of settled law, and an expansive view of presidential power.

We trace this shift through history, cases, and doctrine—asking a simple but urgent question: When a Court abandons consensus and constitutional intent, does it still deserve the final word?